2210 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
21 August 2010
Editor Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! told the entire Bliaring regime so, in July 2006, that they were lying to the public and that they must quit lying and start telling the truth.... Where WAS Prezza [also known as 'John Prescott'] in July 2006? We never heard a single word from him then about the Bliaring touting for Big Biz agenda! Why didn’t Prezza take up the challenge and tell us the truth about who was doing what to advance the agenda of Big Bizenss via the Bliar-0frinbted regime in the UK in July 2006? The ‘news’ in the past 30 minutes that Prezza is spreading ‘concerns’ about the state of the former Labour Party lacks credibility. Especially in view of the fact that everyone, including Prezza, who was in the Bliar-fronted ‘cabinet’, was aware of what the regime was doing: lying to the public. And they did not stop his lies. They did not quit against the liar…. We have said all along that the Bliar-fronted regime was a trout, a stooge for Big Business.
Today’s DAILY MAIL carries a piece eventually showing the links between Blair and the USA Big Business…
The ‘reason’ why they are paying him almost a quarter of a £million for his ‘lecture’ is to do with what ‘services’ Blair performed for all manner of Big Biz agencies and interests while he occupied the office of UK Prime Minister.
The so-called war - the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan are in the service of Big Business....
There is no mystery. .
And it is Blair’s stooge role for MIC and Big Biz that explains why he was so zealous for funding the wasteful, debts-causing Crossrail scam in the name of London…
[To be continued]
12 July 2006
KHOODEELAAR! told the entire Bliaring regime so, in July 2006, that they were lying to the public and that they must quit lying and start telling the truth.... Where WAS Prezza [also known as 'John Prescott'] in July 2006? We never heard a single word from him then about the Bliaring touting for Big Biz agenda! Why didn’t Prezza take up the challenge and tell us the truth about who was doing what to advance the agenda of Big Bizenss via the Bliar-0frinbted regime in the UK in July 2006?
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR! The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006
That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK House of Commons, [12 July 2006] being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’
Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.
For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK House of Commons.
Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law –making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiable
The realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK Housei of Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.
For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a diehard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.
A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.
But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!
So what is the difference?
I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is.
All for nothing.
Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of Lo
We are not expecting anything like the length of the McLibel cases. But we are most empathically about to commence something that may well end up as being the second such court action. Are we right to embark on this? Are we right to say that court actions would cost less person hours than organizing and maintaining massive demonstrations involving thousands of human beings would entail?
These questions are pertinent right now as we have reached the last phase before formal foiling of constitutional law challenges in court against the promoters and other institutionalised and institutional touts for the CrossRail project and its threat to the East End of London.
Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus.
1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms.
2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005.
3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament.
4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project
5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did.
Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification.
That abuse of public money has included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation.
Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally anti-democratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK.
And has Ruth Kelly’s aid a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council?
Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail?
To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only s ay, WATCH this space.
© Muhammad Haque
posted by KHOODEELAAR! NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL @ 2:16 AM 1 comments
Previous Posts
• © Muhammad Haque
Archives
• July 2006
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
KHOODEELAAR! The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006
That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK House of Commons, [12 July 2006] being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’
Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.
For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK House of Commons.
Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law –making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiable
The realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK Housei of Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.
For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a diehard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.
A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.
But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!
So what is the difference?
I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is.
All for nothing.
Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of London!
The mind boggles!
Saturday, 21 August 2010
KHOODEELAAR! told the entire Bliaring regime so, in July 2006, that they were lying to the public and that they must quit lying and start telling the truth.... Where WAS Prezza [also known as 'John Prescott'] in July 2006? We never heard a single word from him then about the Bliaring touting for Big Biz agenda! Why didn’t Prezza take up the challenge and tell us the truth about who was doing what to advance the agenda of Big Bizenss via the Bliar-0frinbted regime in the UK in July 2006? The ‘news’ in the past 30 minutes that Prezza is spreading ‘concerns’ about the state of the former Labour Party lacks credibility. Especially in view of the fact that everyone, including Prezza, who was in the Bliar-fronted ‘cabinet’, was aware of what the regime was doing: lying to the public. And they did not stop his lies. They did not quit against the liar…. We have said all along that the Bliar-fronted regime was a trout, a stooge for Big Business.
KHOODEELAAR! told you so about the abysmal role played against local community by the clique in control on Tower Hamlets Council. As we diagnosed three years ago in October 2007
By © Muhammad Haque 0758 GMT East End of London UK Thursday 25.10.2007
In the nearly 4 years of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London, we have examined the role played against the local community by the so-called local Tower Hamlets Council.
The evidence we have found has been and remains overwhelmingly one of the controlling clique on that Council colluding with the Crossrail onslaught upon the East End.
We ask some new questions and update some of the 800 questions, during the day today Thursday 25 October 2007
We examine the BBC’s latest Crassrail peddling
Why the ‘Crassrail MPs committee wrong to perpetuate lying for CrossRail
We examine the degeneration of the Private Eye into a peddling rag that does not even see the sleaze ball courier that it has become – serving as Ken Lyingstill Livingstone over CRASSrail hole Bill costs – we show why Lyingstill Livingstone was far too quick too brag that he had ‘delivered’ CrossRail – and we ink the PRIVATE Liar’s PR job for the pathetic Livingstone
We update re the latest Crassness by the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ – which is brazenly promoting anther high rise building prompting at Aldgate
Breaking news and updates
The Latest Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments and news. These include the behaviour of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council, the ‘behaviour’ being mostly mis-behaviour in so far as the Council’s persistent lying in its invitation to Crossrail hole attacks.
We also create and publish the appropriate commentary on the unconstitutional behaviour of the UK central Govt, now fronted by Gordon Brown and his sidekick Alistair Darling. Darling’s latest overture to the City of London, perpetrated on Monday 22 October 2007, merely confirms what we have been saying about his role. That he too is operating as a de facto lackey to Big Business which has used CRASSrail hole plotter Ken con Livingstone as their most persistent tout. We have been preparing a series of legal actions against the Crossrail hole Bill and its promoters, peddlers, touts and propagandists. The actions can only begin when all the procedural formalities are completed. The campaign against Crossrail hole Bill being an ongoing process [no matter how many holes in its 'competence' we have found!], the dynamics are still active and we are maintaining all due compliance [formally of course] with the procedures so that the legal and constitutional law challenges shall be implemented whenever the conditions are right.
Campaigning for the defence of the East End of London community throughout this Week following the main day of Eid al Fitr - Eid observed in London on Friday 12 October 2007 Eid Mubarak: Happy Eid to all!
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole role player Tower Hamlets Council and allied misrepresenters against the community the East End of London, publication programme
Khoodeelaar! Asked the Tower Hamlets Council’s current ‘chief executive’ Martin Smith to give us a verbatim record of what ‘cllr’ Rupert Bawden has claimed to have said in his utterances on Crossrail during the ‘fool’ council meeting held on 11 September 2007. Martin Smith has been unable to provide us with that record. We asked the relevant employees in the Council who are supposed to keep records of what is actually said in the course of meetings. We have been informed that the Council ‘does not make or keep’ records. Assuming that this is true, Khoodeelaar! Has now organised our own investigation into Rupert Boredom and we shall be publishing our findings on this most unwanted of the impositions on the East End of London by the Blairing, corrupting time-serving clique that must have brought about the disastrous, anti-social, anti-democratic condition in which an anti-social entity such as Rupert Boredom could be foisted upon the East End of London [To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! Dissecting the lying claim by Michael Snyder about helping the ‘boroughs’ next to the City of London – coming on this site and on the associated web sites soon exposing City of London’s Crassrail peddler Michael Snyder’s latest fabricating and lies
Exposing Tower Hamlets ‘MP’ Jim F.Patrick pathetic utterances on ‘jobs’ in the East End
Analysing the Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique and its brazen lies: [TO be continued]
There is no reason to think that the ego of the egotist Ken Livingstone will be ever satisfied, no matter what publicly-paid for glory platforms he is given.
This is particularly the case with the thousands of people among the East |End and inner city parts of London this weekend who will suffer as a result of the greedy, egotistic role played by Livingstone as a tout for CRASSrail hole plot.
The Crossrail hole-plot-backer ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has misled people and has sought to occupy publicly-paid for positions by lying right, left and centre. Never more so than in his egotistic and undignified assumption that he must get all the glory-making headlines. He has come unstuck on the Olympics hosting bid. The 2012 Olympics stunt is going to cost more than just extra £Billions. So is Crossrail. Both schemes are IMPOSED on the image of London by the egotistic, time-serving, self-serving, careerist Ken Livingstone by his operating in collusion with Big Construction conglomerates who will be the main beneficiaries. Ordinary people will NOT be the beneficiaries. £Billions of public money from other, genuinely needed areas of society and life are being taken away in order to fund the 2012 Olympics stunt. Both headline-grabbing boats are permanently being peddled by Livingstone. In contrast, Livingstone has stayed very quiet about the ‘reasons’ for such high and permanent-looking joblessness among inner London people. Most of those ‘just happened’ to be [as some of the Ken Lyingstill-‘friendly’ ‘research’ outfits themselves have been admitting] of ‘Bangladeshi’ and of ‘Caribbean’ backgrounds. The truth is that for 30 years or more Ken Livingstone has been one of the CAUSERS of long term joblessness and skills deficit among these groups. How?
Khoodeelaar! no to CrossRail hole campaign asks
:-
What is the CRASSrail link with the confession by schools inspectorate Ofsted and Christine Gilbert that the majority of schools in the inner cities in England are failing? Why is Christine Gilbert now confessing to the lies she had told and helped to be told for more than 10 years when she was employed in tower hamlets council? when will Christine Gilbert Confess similarly to her role in the pro-CRASSrail hole-inviting lies, concealments and the assortments of dissembling done by Tower Hamlets council?
Is the latest rumour just a rumour, or has the ‘Respect’ grouping in Tower Hamlets reached a new level of irrecoverability? What is the mystery [!] behind their continuing failure to say why they are silent against CrossRail? And why that ‘motion’ as tabled on Crossrail for the 11 September 2007 ‘full council meeting’ was not worded as a campaigning one?
What did an Ofsted chief steal ?
Why is Ken ‘con’ Livingstone wrong to peddle the stream of daily lies, the latest being that he will ‘fund’ via ‘Crossrail’, a ‘skills academy’? Does Gordon Brown realise that Livingstone is conning his way into being state-funded as a dictator? Who is responsible for the Orwellian nightmayor being created at the expense of London?
>
By ©Muhammad Haque
0950 GMT London Friday 19 October 2007
There is a piece in the Times, attributed to a Lucy Alexander, prompting property speculation.
But she manages to attack and misrepresent the East End in a way that would not be expected if she wrote a truthful, respectful and honest piece. As, she would have written differently and made the opposite points the racist and the offensive comments she has published via the Times.
The fact that the piece is apparently about property but reproduces some of the most racist and ignorant stereotypes and falsifications against the Bangladeshis, is not unconnected with the same attitude that underlies the behaviour of the local Tower Hamlets Council in its own peddling of the CrossRail hole-plotters' lies.
More on that in the later parts of this commentary.
Back to Lucy Alexander and her piece as published by the Times today.
She offers no evidence far less explanation. In a piece that is essentially about property speculation, she as manages to perpetuate a number op prejudicial stereotypes at the expense of the Bangladeshis.
She does not say what studies she made of the UK economy, or what evidence she ever looked for to explain the causal link between Bangladeshi women not working and the perpetuated suggestion that the preponderance of ‘worklessness’ is attributable to some mysterious propensity on the parts of the Bangladeshis generally and the Bangladeshi women in particular.
Lucy Alexander must have been resident in a fantasy part of Tower Hamlets in the East End of London for her to say that :
“two thirds of local Bangladeshi women of working age were unemployed. My flatmates and I were often the only women in the street not wearing burkas. A local policeman kindly informed me, while handing me a rape alarm, that my street was known as “the front line” in fights between rival gangs of drug dealers.”
[To be continued]
Updates due today [Thursday 18 October 2007] include these:-
Quizzing ‘Canary Wharf MP’ Jim F Patrick on joblessness and the CRASSrail hole calamities
How the ‘ethnicity linked’ ‘media’ ‘based’ at addresses in Tower Hamlets are in fact agents for far away interests and agendas and how they are being used as tools by the ‘nice’ [E L Idiotiser again, this week] Denise Jones to aid the adding to, in and of the deprivation of the East End of London
How is it that the Lib Dems ‘group’ leader' Stephanie Eaton is featuring again with the racist Tory while failing to show any evidence of understanding of what really matters to the living people in the same Borough where she has again decided to play cheap politics by her grave obsession with the alleged dishonouring of the dead?
Planning fraud on London
In the nearly 4 years of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London, we have examined the role played against the local community by the so-called local Tower Hamlets Council.
The evidence we have found has been and remains overwhelmingly one of the controlling clique on that Council colluding with the Crossrail onslaught upon the East End.
We ask some new questions and update some of the 800 questions, during the day today Thursday 25 October 2007
We examine the BBC’s latest Crassrail peddling
Why the ‘Crassrail MPs committee wrong to perpetuate lying for CrossRail
We examine the degeneration of the Private Eye into a peddling rag that does not even see the sleaze ball courier that it has become – serving as Ken Lyingstill Livingstone over CRASSrail hole Bill costs – we show why Lyingstill Livingstone was far too quick too brag that he had ‘delivered’ CrossRail – and we ink the PRIVATE Liar’s PR job for the pathetic Livingstone
We update re the latest Crassness by the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ – which is brazenly promoting anther high rise building prompting at Aldgate
Breaking news and updates
The Latest Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments and news. These include the behaviour of the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council, the ‘behaviour’ being mostly mis-behaviour in so far as the Council’s persistent lying in its invitation to Crossrail hole attacks.
We also create and publish the appropriate commentary on the unconstitutional behaviour of the UK central Govt, now fronted by Gordon Brown and his sidekick Alistair Darling. Darling’s latest overture to the City of London, perpetrated on Monday 22 October 2007, merely confirms what we have been saying about his role. That he too is operating as a de facto lackey to Big Business which has used CRASSrail hole plotter Ken con Livingstone as their most persistent tout. We have been preparing a series of legal actions against the Crossrail hole Bill and its promoters, peddlers, touts and propagandists. The actions can only begin when all the procedural formalities are completed. The campaign against Crossrail hole Bill being an ongoing process [no matter how many holes in its 'competence' we have found!], the dynamics are still active and we are maintaining all due compliance [formally of course] with the procedures so that the legal and constitutional law challenges shall be implemented whenever the conditions are right.
Campaigning for the defence of the East End of London community throughout this Week following the main day of Eid al Fitr - Eid observed in London on Friday 12 October 2007 Eid Mubarak: Happy Eid to all!
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole role player Tower Hamlets Council and allied misrepresenters against the community the East End of London, publication programme
Khoodeelaar! Asked the Tower Hamlets Council’s current ‘chief executive’ Martin Smith to give us a verbatim record of what ‘cllr’ Rupert Bawden has claimed to have said in his utterances on Crossrail during the ‘fool’ council meeting held on 11 September 2007. Martin Smith has been unable to provide us with that record. We asked the relevant employees in the Council who are supposed to keep records of what is actually said in the course of meetings. We have been informed that the Council ‘does not make or keep’ records. Assuming that this is true, Khoodeelaar! Has now organised our own investigation into Rupert Boredom and we shall be publishing our findings on this most unwanted of the impositions on the East End of London by the Blairing, corrupting time-serving clique that must have brought about the disastrous, anti-social, anti-democratic condition in which an anti-social entity such as Rupert Boredom could be foisted upon the East End of London [To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! Dissecting the lying claim by Michael Snyder about helping the ‘boroughs’ next to the City of London – coming on this site and on the associated web sites soon exposing City of London’s Crassrail peddler Michael Snyder’s latest fabricating and lies
Exposing Tower Hamlets ‘MP’ Jim F.Patrick pathetic utterances on ‘jobs’ in the East End
Analysing the Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique and its brazen lies: [TO be continued]
There is no reason to think that the ego of the egotist Ken Livingstone will be ever satisfied, no matter what publicly-paid for glory platforms he is given.
This is particularly the case with the thousands of people among the East |End and inner city parts of London this weekend who will suffer as a result of the greedy, egotistic role played by Livingstone as a tout for CRASSrail hole plot.
The Crossrail hole-plot-backer ‘Undone mayor’ Ken Livingstone has misled people and has sought to occupy publicly-paid for positions by lying right, left and centre. Never more so than in his egotistic and undignified assumption that he must get all the glory-making headlines. He has come unstuck on the Olympics hosting bid. The 2012 Olympics stunt is going to cost more than just extra £Billions. So is Crossrail. Both schemes are IMPOSED on the image of London by the egotistic, time-serving, self-serving, careerist Ken Livingstone by his operating in collusion with Big Construction conglomerates who will be the main beneficiaries. Ordinary people will NOT be the beneficiaries. £Billions of public money from other, genuinely needed areas of society and life are being taken away in order to fund the 2012 Olympics stunt. Both headline-grabbing boats are permanently being peddled by Livingstone. In contrast, Livingstone has stayed very quiet about the ‘reasons’ for such high and permanent-looking joblessness among inner London people. Most of those ‘just happened’ to be [as some of the Ken Lyingstill-‘friendly’ ‘research’ outfits themselves have been admitting] of ‘Bangladeshi’ and of ‘Caribbean’ backgrounds. The truth is that for 30 years or more Ken Livingstone has been one of the CAUSERS of long term joblessness and skills deficit among these groups. How?
Khoodeelaar! no to CrossRail hole campaign asks
:-
What is the CRASSrail link with the confession by schools inspectorate Ofsted and Christine Gilbert that the majority of schools in the inner cities in England are failing? Why is Christine Gilbert now confessing to the lies she had told and helped to be told for more than 10 years when she was employed in tower hamlets council? when will Christine Gilbert Confess similarly to her role in the pro-CRASSrail hole-inviting lies, concealments and the assortments of dissembling done by Tower Hamlets council?
Is the latest rumour just a rumour, or has the ‘Respect’ grouping in Tower Hamlets reached a new level of irrecoverability? What is the mystery [!] behind their continuing failure to say why they are silent against CrossRail? And why that ‘motion’ as tabled on Crossrail for the 11 September 2007 ‘full council meeting’ was not worded as a campaigning one?
What did an Ofsted chief steal ?
Why is Ken ‘con’ Livingstone wrong to peddle the stream of daily lies, the latest being that he will ‘fund’ via ‘Crossrail’, a ‘skills academy’? Does Gordon Brown realise that Livingstone is conning his way into being state-funded as a dictator? Who is responsible for the Orwellian nightmayor being created at the expense of London?
>
By ©Muhammad Haque
0950 GMT London Friday 19 October 2007
There is a piece in the Times, attributed to a Lucy Alexander, prompting property speculation.
But she manages to attack and misrepresent the East End in a way that would not be expected if she wrote a truthful, respectful and honest piece. As, she would have written differently and made the opposite points the racist and the offensive comments she has published via the Times.
The fact that the piece is apparently about property but reproduces some of the most racist and ignorant stereotypes and falsifications against the Bangladeshis, is not unconnected with the same attitude that underlies the behaviour of the local Tower Hamlets Council in its own peddling of the CrossRail hole-plotters' lies.
More on that in the later parts of this commentary.
Back to Lucy Alexander and her piece as published by the Times today.
She offers no evidence far less explanation. In a piece that is essentially about property speculation, she as manages to perpetuate a number op prejudicial stereotypes at the expense of the Bangladeshis.
She does not say what studies she made of the UK economy, or what evidence she ever looked for to explain the causal link between Bangladeshi women not working and the perpetuated suggestion that the preponderance of ‘worklessness’ is attributable to some mysterious propensity on the parts of the Bangladeshis generally and the Bangladeshi women in particular.
Lucy Alexander must have been resident in a fantasy part of Tower Hamlets in the East End of London for her to say that :
“two thirds of local Bangladeshi women of working age were unemployed. My flatmates and I were often the only women in the street not wearing burkas. A local policeman kindly informed me, while handing me a rape alarm, that my street was known as “the front line” in fights between rival gangs of drug dealers.”
[To be continued]
Updates due today [Thursday 18 October 2007] include these:-
Quizzing ‘Canary Wharf MP’ Jim F Patrick on joblessness and the CRASSrail hole calamities
How the ‘ethnicity linked’ ‘media’ ‘based’ at addresses in Tower Hamlets are in fact agents for far away interests and agendas and how they are being used as tools by the ‘nice’ [E L Idiotiser again, this week] Denise Jones to aid the adding to, in and of the deprivation of the East End of London
How is it that the Lib Dems ‘group’ leader' Stephanie Eaton is featuring again with the racist Tory while failing to show any evidence of understanding of what really matters to the living people in the same Borough where she has again decided to play cheap politics by her grave obsession with the alleged dishonouring of the dead?
Planning fraud on London
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)